Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Donegal & Conoy Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 12, 1953No. 16785PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, Justice.

This is an appeal by the defendant Company from judgment against it on a fire insurance policy for $2,000.00 on a farm tenant house. The insured applied to the company’s agent for the insurance in an amount to be determined by the agent. The latter immediately inspected the house and found it vacant. Nevertheless he then prepared the policy which he kept in his possession. It was dated December 12, 1950, and contained the following condition:

“Conditions suspending or restricting insurance. Unless otherwise provided in writing added hereto this company shall not be liable for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Brown v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Simons v. American Fire Underwriters of the American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kolivera v. Hartford Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  2. Old Colony Insurance Company v. E. W. Garvey and Wife, Mary L. GarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  3. Pappas Enterprises, Inc. v. Commerce & Industry InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Home Mutual Fire Ins. v. PierceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API