Legal Opinion

Home Mutual Fire Ins. v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 16, 1966No. 5-3880PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Osro Cobb, Justice.

On January 12, 1965, appellee’s chicken brooder house and equipment and supplies contained therein were damaged by fire in the amount of $15,550. At the time of the loss, appellee was covered by appellant’s policy of insurance scheduling coverage on the brooder house at $10,000 and on equipment and supplies there at $6,000. A feed tank valued at $450 was salvaged from the fire and the loss resulted in a claim against appellant in the sum of $15,550. Appellant took the position that its liability was limited to two thirds of the loss. All of the facts relied upon by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashworth v. Builders' Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Agricultural Insurance v. Hamilton ex rel. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  3. Continental Insurance Co. of New York v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Republic County Mutual Fire Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Hotchkiss v. Phœnix Insurance Co. of BrooklynWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gas Kwick, Inc. v. United Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Kolivera v. Hartford Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Pappas Enterprises, Inc. v. Commerce & Industry InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. State Farm General Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  5. DeBartolo v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API