Heiser v. Rodway
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentFosheim, Circuit Judge
It is abiding law in this state that in a forcible entry and detainer action only the immediate right of possession is involved, Raich v. Weisman, 1931, 58 S.D. 4, 234 N.W. 664. It precludes the defense of usury, Robinson v. McKinney, 1886, 4 Dak. 290, 29 N.W. 658; Northwestern Mortgage Trust Co. v. Bradley, et al., 1897, 9 S.D. 495, 70 N.W. 648. In McManus v. Maloy, 1912, 30 S.D. 373, 138 N.W. 963 and Aegerter v. Hayes, 1929, 55 S.D. 337, 226 N.W. 345, we held that equitable rights of the parties cannot therein be litigated. This is not a position shared by only a few states as the majority…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Parsons v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. NieuwenhuisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Byrne v. McKeachieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Holzworth v. RothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Cullen v. DickinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.