Legal Opinion
Thiele v. Astrue
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 5, 2012No. Civ. No. 10-4871 (JJK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JEFFREY J. KEYES, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff Nadine Thiele seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), who denied Plaintiffs applications for disability-insurance benefits and supplemental security income. This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Doc. Nos. 12, 17). The parties have consented to this Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over all proceedings in this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and Federal Rule of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sheila J. Young v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Dennis W. Pearsall v. Larry Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Robert K. Haley v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 1Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Calderman v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Khalif v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Scarborough v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Schauls v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Schwan v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019