Legal Opinion

Chiesa v. Fetchko

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1984No. Appeal 77 W.D. Appeal Docket 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The parties in the instant appeal frame the issues as being whether Section 602 of the Health Care Services Malpractice Act (Act), Act of October 15, 1975, P.L. 390, as amended, 40 P.S. § 1301.602 (Supp.1983-84), applies to medical malpractice cases settled within the exclusive jurisdiction of the common pleas courts. We need not address this issue, however, inasmuch as the arbitration process in the area of medical malpractice has been declared unconstitutional. Heller v. Frankston, 504 Pa. 528, 475 A.2d 1291 (1984); Mattos v. Thompson, 491 Pa. 385, 421 A.2d 190 (1980). The statutory…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mattos v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Heller v. FrankstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Ass'n of Rural & Small Schools v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Miller v. Lankenau HospitalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Viadock v. Nesbitt Memorial HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Chiesa v. FetchkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Coldwell Banker Manning Realty, Inc. v. Cushman & WakefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API