Legal Opinion

Mohs v. Quarton

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

The evidence was in sharp conflict. The transaction between the parties was entered into in 1941 at a time when the respondent Harold B. Quarton, who was in the service of the federal government in the state department, was to leave shortly for Korea. He was anxious to acquire a home in Madison for his family before leaving, and consulted with appellant, Carl E. Mohs, a real-estate dealer and builder. Mohs showed him several homes, and it was finally agreed that respondents would purchase a lot from Mrs. Mohs at a cost of $2,500 and that Mohs would build a house thereon. The plans were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Truelsch v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Wojahn v. National Union Bank of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Von Trott v. Von TrottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ott v. BoringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Goodwin v. von CotzhausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plante v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Kleinstick v. DaleidenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. W. G. Slugg Seed & Fertilizer, Inc. v. Paulsen Lumber, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. MacPherson v. StrandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API