Legal Opinion

St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 29, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-69-LPSPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

STARK, District Judge:

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (D.I.9) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny Defendants’ motion.

I. BACKGROUND

On December 30, 2011, St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. (“St. Clair” or “Plaintiff’) filed a complaint against Samsung Electronics USA, Inc. (“SE USA”). See St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics USA, Inc., No. 11-1306 (D.Del. Dec. 30, 2011) [hereinafter Samsung I ]. In Samsung I, St. Clair alleged that SE USA willfully infringed six of St. Clair’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. EMC Corp. v. Pure Storage, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
  2. Novartis AG v. Actavis, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017
  3. American General Life Insurance Company v. Wilmington Trust, National AssociationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
  4. CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc. v. FitchDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
  5. DRIT LP v. Glaxo Group LimitedDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API