Legal Opinion
United States v. Schiefen
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 20, 1995No. CIV 94-4243PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PIERSOL, District Judge.
In 1970, Defendant Jerome T. Schiefen [Schiefen] and his wife, Barbara M. Schiefen, 1 borrowed $53,500.00 from the Farmers Home Administration [FmHA], securing payment with a mortgage on real property located in Lincoln County, South Dakota. Schiefen and his wife defaulted on the note and the United States filed suit to foreclose the secured property, as provided by the terms of the promissory note, on October 25, 1994. Doe. 1. The original complaint was returned unserved. Doc. 5.
On January 18, 1995, the United States filed an amended…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. John Vincent MacKovichCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- McLaughlin v. CitiMortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Beaner v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2005
- Davis v. Synovus BankDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
- United States v. MackovichCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000