Legal Opinion

J. & Jay, Inc. v. E. Perry Iron & Metal Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 8, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, C.J.

This tort action is before us on appeal from the direction of a verdict for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s case. The plaintiff charges that his truck was damaged through the negligent operation of a crane in unloading a heavy steel machine.

There are two controlling issues. First: Is res ipsa loquitur applicable? Second: If so, is res ipsa loquitur available to the plaintiff under the pretrial order?

Under the familiar rule we take the evidence including inferences reasonably to be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the appellant. MacLean v. Jack, 160 Me. 93, 100, 198…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Chaisson v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  3. Cratty v. Samuel Aceto & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  4. Edwards v. Cumberland County Power & Light Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  5. MacLean v. JackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  2. Corbett v. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  3. Krebs v. CorriganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Corbett v. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  5. Corbett v. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API