Legal Opinion

Danilo Zabala Artez v. Richard T. Mulcrone, Commissioner, and U. S. Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1982No. 81-2037PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the brief and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Danilo Zabala Artez appeals from a district court order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. In his petition Artez challenged the United States Parole Commission’s denial of his application for parole. Specifically, he alleged that 18 U.S.C. § 4206(a) 1 unconstitutionally grants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Benigno Marrero v. Warden, Lewisburg PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Vega v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Robert HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Grant C. Affleck, United States of America v. Frank Kowalik, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Geraghty v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. BrittmanDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API