Legal Opinion

Moore v. State Farm Life Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Chief Justice.

This case presents for review summary judgment, affirmed by the Court of Appeals, that the husband, who was the primary beneficiary under a policy of insurance on the life of his wife, is barred by T.C.A. § 31-1-106 (1984) from receiving the proceeds of the policy because he was convicted, on a plea of guilty, of vehicular homicide for his wife’s death. This Court finds that because the proof does not show that the husband intended to kill the insured, his right to the proceeds was not forfeited.

State Farm Life Insurance Company issued certain policies of life…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Der Minasian v. Aetna Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Jamison v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  3. Hicks v. BoshearsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Conner v. HolbertCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961
  5. Houser v. HavenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brittany Noel Nelson v. Charles W. MyresTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Gerber Life Insurance v. WallaceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
  3. John T. Bell v. Richard Gene NolanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  4. Primerica Life Insurance Company v. ArnoldDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API