Legal Opinion
National Council on Compensation Insurance v. Caro & Graifman, P.C.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 31, 2003No. CIV.3:00CV01925 (AHN)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
NEVAS, District Judge.
Defendants Joseph Gall (“Gall”) and Caro & Graifinan (“C & G”), move to dismiss this case on several grounds, including (1) lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (2) lack of diversity jurisdiction; (3) improper venue; (4) the presence of a prior pending action; and (5) a failure to state with particularity a claim for which relief can be granted. For the following reasons, the motion [Doc. # 34] is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
This civil suit arises from a criminal prosecution previously adjudicated before the court. On November 5, 1996, a jury convicted…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nettie Marie Jones v. Edwin H. Weibrecht, Jr., Edwin H. Weibrecht, Jr. v. Nettie Marie JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Ouaknine v. MacFarlaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Atlanta Shipping Corporation, Inc. v. Chemical BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McKay v. LongmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Carney v. LopezDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Cendant Corp. v. SheltonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Power Paragon, Inc. v. Precision Technology USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- France v. BernsteinDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.