Legal Opinion

Martin Bros. Signs, Inc. v. Vice

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1992No. A8905-02666; CA A67674PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff sign company appeals from a judgment in its favor in this breach of contract action. ORS 19.010. It argues that the court erred in not awarding liquidated damages. We affirm.

Plaintiff manufactures, sells and leases signs. Defendants contracted with plaintiff for the manufacture and lease of two grocery store signs. Defendants paid a $550 deposit and signed a lease for 60 months at $350 per month, beginning on the day the signs were installed.

Defendants were unhappy with the installation and quality of the signs. They refused to pay rent and removed the signs. Plaintiff sued for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. DiTommaso Realty, Inc. v. Moak Motorcycles, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin Bros. Signs v. ViceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API