Legal Opinion

Martin Bros. Signs v. Vice

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1993No. A8905-02666; CA A67674Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff sign company appealed from a judgment in its favor in a breach of contract action, assigning error to the trial court’s failure to award liquidated damages. ORS 19.010. We affirmed. 117 Or App 84, 843 P2d 510 (1992). Plaintiff has now filed a motion for reconsideration. ORAP 9.15. We allow the motion, withdraw our opinion, reverse and remand.

In its appeal, plaintiff argued that the liquidated damages provided for in the contract should have been awarded. Although we found that the clause was a liquidated damages clause, we held that there was evidence from which the trial court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Martin Bros. Signs, Inc. v. ViceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API