Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vann Bell

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 5, 2006No. 05-P-1197PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatzmann, J.

If sheer volume of literature be the measure of fascination, then few subjects have been as intriguing for criminal law scholars as the nexus between the doctrine of impossibility and the crime of attempt.1 Perhaps this is so because that subject raises issues that are central to the fundamental question of what kinds of conduct warrant the application of the criminal sanction.2 In this case we are asked to *267consider the application of the concepts of impossibility and attempt to a technique that has become integral to law enforcement — the undercover “sting” operation.

A police undercover…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. O'DELLMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. United States v. Martin Molina Oviedo, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. PeasleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Commonwealth v. KennedyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Van BellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. State v. ReidSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. PatelWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. United States v. ConigliaroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. United States v. ConigliaroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API