Legal Opinion

State v. Aillon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 12, 1980PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotter, C. J.

This appeal raises the issue whether the double jeopardy clause of the United States constitution prohibits a third trial of a defendant who successfully petitioned for a new trial after his first trial, which resulted in a conviction, and whose second trial terminated in a mistrial when the jury could not agree on a verdict.

The defendant was arrested and charged with three counts of murder alleged to have occurred in August, 1972. On September 1,1973, after a trial to a jury, he was found guilty of murder on all three counts.

The accused after a conviction filed a petition for a new trial,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Aillon v. MeachumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API