Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Alkema

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1953No. 7868Published

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

Appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to an order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment against plaintiff and in favor of defendant. The material facts deduced are uncontradicted.

Defendants owned and operated a fruit farm near Ogden, Utah. During the harvest season transient workers were often hired by defendants to pick fruit. Such workers were usually recruited from an Ogden employment office early every morning and were returned to town after completion of the day’s work. The growers furnished picking buckets and standard eight-foot, three-legged picking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Szabo v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  2. Russell v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Reynolds v. American Foundry & MacHine Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Guitron v. Oregon Short Line R.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Proctor v. Town Club, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API