Legal Opinion

Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 1, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Yan Sant, Commissioner

Affirming.

The action was instituted by appellee to recover of appellant for permanent injuries and loss of time sustained as a result of being struck by a taxicab allegedly owned and being operated by appellant. The original petition' averred specific acts of negligence, and the issue was joined thereon. However, on- the first trial the court instructed the jury as if appellee had alleged and relied on a general allegation of negligence. Per ceiving- this to have been error, the Trial Court sustained appellant’s motion for a new trial; whereupon appellee filed an amended…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wigginton's Adm'r v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Ralston v. DosseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Huber & Huber Motor Express v. Martin's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Louisville & N. R. R. v. Pointer's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  5. Webb v. Dixie-Ohio Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jack Cole Company and Dixie Highway Express, Inc. v. Mrs. W. H. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Day v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Howell v. OlsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Simons v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958
  5. Burgan v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API