Legal Opinion

Grant v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 16, 1934No. Docket Nos. 62029, 65577, 68324Published

Where a husband and wife domiciled in California enter into a valid agreement that the earnings and salary of the husband after the date thereof shall be the separate income and property of the husband, no part of such earnings and salary is taxable to the wife.

1Opinion of the Court

HELEN E. GRANT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Grant v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 62029, 65577, 68324.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

29 B.T.A. 760; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1484;

January 16, 1934, Promulgated

Where a husband and wife domiciled in California enter into a valid agreement that the earnings and salary of the husband after the date thereof shall be the separate income and property of the husband, no part of such earnings and salary is taxable to the wife.

Bayley Kohlmeier, Esq., for the petitioner.

C. C. Holmes, Esq., for the respondent.

LANSDON

OPINION.

LANSDON: The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MalcolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Wren v. WrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Gray v. PerlisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API