Legal Opinion

Gray v. Perlis

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1926No. Docket No. 5125PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy, brought this action to recover certain personal property, claiming that it belonged to the bankrupt’s estate, also to require an accounting, and for damages for alleged conversion. Judgment was given for defendants. Plaintiff appealed.

For several years prior to 1916 respondent B. Perlis was engaged in business on Sutter Street, in San Francisco, as a ladies’ tailor, employing some ten persons. In September of that year said business failed and Perlis made an assignment for the benefit of creditors to the board of trade, but was not released by said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PepperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Wren v. WrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Hossfeldt v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. CleverdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Nevins v. NevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Estate of ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. In Re the Estate of PughWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Mosesian v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API