Legal Opinion

State v. Dallas

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1994No. 20954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order by the district court denying a motion under I.C.R. 35 to correct an allegedly illegal sentence. The question of whether a sentence is illegal, and therefore subject to correction under Rule 35, is an issue for free review on appeal. State v. Josephson, 124 Idaho 286, 858 P.2d 825 (Ct.App.1993). Here, we conclude that the challenged sentence was not illegal, and we affirm the order denying relief under Rule 35.

The appellant, Claude Dallas, was sentenced on two counts of voluntary manslaughter and for using a firearm in committing those…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JosephsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. KaiserIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. KaiserIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. StoreyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FarwellIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. WeberIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dallas v. AraveIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API