Legal Opinion

People v. Presley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that the showup identification should have been suppressed. Defendant was identified by an eyewitness within 15 minutes of the commission of the crime and very near to the crime scene. Although the police officer may have informed the eyewitness prior to the showup that defendant fit the description given by him and defendant was handcuffed at the showup, the proximity of the identification procedure to the time and place of the crime supports the conclusion that the showup was "within the permissible boundaries…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DuuvonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. LomackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. SchraderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. RicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API