Legal Opinion

Sander v. Los Angeles Ry. Corporation

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1918No. Civ. No. 2570PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Defendants appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The action was to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant. Defendant was a common carrier of passengers, and plaintiff was a passenger on one of its electric cars in the city of Los Angel'es when she suffered her alleged injuries. The car upon which plaintiff was riding was at a standstill, having stopped to permit the discharge of passengers. Plaintiff was preceded from the car by her husband. As she reached the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seller v. Market-Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Steele v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Fink v. SladeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Holt v. Southwest Missouri Electric Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Morris v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ridley v. Grifall Trucking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Cox v. Central California Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API