Lyon v. Thurston County
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 LEVI LYON, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, Case No. C23-5450-SKV 10 v. ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 THURSTON COUNTY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment. Thurston Defendants1 argue 16 summary judgment is appropriate here because Plaintiffs have failed to state a claim against the 17 Thurston County Board of County Commissioners (the “Board”) and because the doctrines of 18 claim preclusion and accord and satisfaction bar their claims. Dkt. 16.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.