Legal Opinion

William M. Boyer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 10, 1984No. 83-1522PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In our judgment, the sole issue in this case is whether a temporary order for support under Section 32 of Chapter 209 of the Massachusetts laws, Mass.Gen.Laws Ann. ch. 209, § 32 (West 1976), effects a legal separation between husband and wife “under a decree of * * * separate maintenance” for federal income tax purposes, see Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 153, 26 U.S.C. § 153 (1982), and thereby allows a taxpayer to claim a marital status of “single.” The Tax Court held that such an order under Section 32 entitled taxpayer William M. Boyer to claim a marital status of single for 1976. He was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boettiger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  2. H. David Boyter and Angela M. Boyter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  3. Lilley Capodanno v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, R. T. Capodanno v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Dunn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  5. Gould v. GouldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucy Freck, A/K/A Lucy Cameron v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Tak Broadcasting Corp. v. Trinity Broadcasting of Florida, Inc. (In Re Tak Broadcasting Corp.)District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1992
  3. Freck v. IRSCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Freyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. Ward v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API