Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Parrott v. Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1914Published

Appeal by.defendants from 0. H. Allen, J., at November Term, 1913, of LeNOIr. ■

1ConcurrenceAlleN, J.

The defendant is using and claiming a right of way about a mile in length, under a deed executed by the ancestor of the plaintiff, and under- whom the plaintiff claims, and the sole consideration for the deed, as expressed therein, is the promise and agreement that trains running along this right of way shall, upon notice, stop at a platform erected 'and maintained by the owner of the land, and it would seem to be unjust to permit the defendant to retain the right of way and at the same time repudiate the agreement, which it proposes to do.

I concur in the opinion of the Court, that the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. State ex rel. MayorSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  3. Rice v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Bestor v. WathenIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API