Legal Opinion

Leonard Saldana v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1960No. 16233PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We hold that the second judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California was legally justified sua sponte under the circumstances of this case in ordering the plea of guilty on the first and second counts withdrawn (which plea had been entered before another judge of the same court) and directing the entry of a plea of not guilty.1 Further, we are con*353vinced that the trial, after this change of plea, did not constitute double jeopardy2 for the defendant.3

The fifth count, the subject of a ten year…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Doan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jesus Padilla Enriquez, Raul Franco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. WagnerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965
  3. Leonard Saldana v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API