Legal Opinion
People v. Bloomfield
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 14, 2006PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*167OPINION OF THE COURT
ClPARICK, J.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether there is sufficient evidence that fraudulent letters kept in the files of an enterprise’s legal counsel, rather than at the company’s headquarters, were “[b]usiness record[s]” as defined by Penal Law § 175.00 (2). We conclude that the location where a document is maintained is merely a factor, not determinative, of its status as a business record under the statute, and that the People presented legally sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the trier of fact.
In 1992, three brokers—the Westfield…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tall Trees Construction Corp. v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. KisinaNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. CintronNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. HoughtalingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. GratesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Casmento, Jr. v. Volmar Construction, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.