Fry v. Hudspeth
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
Carl Fry prepared and filed his own petition for a writ of habeas corpus and his application that counsel be appointed for him so that he might be properly represented in court. The respondent filed a motion that the petition be made more definite in certain particulars and that motion was sustained and petitioner thereupon filed an amended petition, the respondent answered and *675John E. Buehler, a reputable and competent attorney at law, was appointed to represent the petitioner.
The following facts are not in dispute. In the latter part of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BaddersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- State v. MowrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Rorerts v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Cochran v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Harris v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- State v. DaegeleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Bush v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- State v. AspinwallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.