Legal Opinion

Fry v. Hudspeth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1948No. 37,393PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Carl Fry prepared and filed his own petition for a writ of habeas corpus and his application that counsel be appointed for him so that he might be properly represented in court. The respondent filed a motion that the petition be made more definite in certain particulars and that motion was sustained and petitioner thereupon filed an amended petition, the respondent answered and *675John E. Buehler, a reputable and competent attorney at law, was appointed to represent the petitioner.

The following facts are not in dispute. In the latter part of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BaddersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. State v. MowrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Rorerts v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Cochran v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Harris v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. State v. DaegeleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Bush v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. State v. JordanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. State v. AspinwallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API