Legal Opinion

State v. Aspinwall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1953No. 38,592 and 38,593PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

The. defendant appeals from convictions of kidnapping in the second degree and robbery in the first degree.

The facts to sustain the convictions are not in dispute. Only sufficient facts will be narrated to present defendant’s contentions. In substance they were about as follows:

On October 18, 1940, the defendant was charged jointly with one LaVerne Eugene Keeling in two separate complaints with commission of the offenses above stated. The case against Keeling was disposed of long ago and is not involved here. Only Ernest Aspinwall appeals.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. NeffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. State v. BaddersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. State v. RicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. State v. MombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. In re GarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. State v. HessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. State v. McCurrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. State v. BrowningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API