Legal Opinion

DeMarco v. Napora

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County

Decided October 8, 1982No. 127 Civil 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

SHAULIS, J.,

This is an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff minor child. We have before us defendants’ preliminary objections in the nature of' demurrers, motions to strike and motions for more specific pleadings.

FACTS

Plaintiff William Bernard DeMarco, a minor, sues for injuries allegedly incurred due to the negligence of all defendants involved. Plaintiffs Frank and Doris DeMarco are husband and wife and the parents of said minor child.

On the date of the alleged accident, William was riding his bicycle when a truck, operated by George M. Napora, Jr., allegedly struck William…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Hudock v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Pike County Hotels Corp. v. KieferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Smith v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Martin v. SoblotneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API