Nilsa B.B. v. Blackwell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Margett, J.
We hold that neither CPLR 301 nor 302 (subd [b]) provides a basis for the exercise of personal jurisdiction by the courts of New York over a respondent in a paternity proceeding who is neither physically present nor domiciled in the State at the time of service of process and who has not consented to the exercise of such jurisdiction.
The petitioner in this paternity proceeding is a resident of New York. She alleges in her petition that respondent is a resident of Missouri. She further alleges that she had a “relationship with sexual intercourse” with respondent…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- McGowan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Lancaster v. Colonial Motor Freight Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- First Capital Asset Management, Inc. v. Brickellbush, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Jacobs v. Felix Bloch Erben Verlag Fur Buhne Film Und Funk KGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.