David Hieber v. Oakland County, et al.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DAVID HIEBER, Case No. 22-11417 Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm v. United States District Judge OAKLAND COUNTY, et al., Defendants. ___________________________ / OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 108) I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff, David Hieber, has before the court a pretermination procedural due process claim. (ECF No. 102). Plaintiff originally brought claims of age discrimination under
42 U.S.C. § 1983
and Michigan’s Elliott- Larsen Civil Rights Act (“ELCRA”), denial of both pre- and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McLean v. 988011 Ontario, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.