In re S.G.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
This contested adoption ease arises out of two petitions to adopt P.U.K. and D.F.K.: one filed by S.G. and L.G., P.U.K and D.F.K’s foster parents; and one filed by D.D. and L.D., P.U.K. and D.F.K.’s *120grandmother and step-grandfather. The district court considered both petitions and found that it was in the best interests of P.U.K. and D.F.K. to be adopted by S.G. and L.G. (“foster parents”) and accordingly granted their petition. The court then denied the adoption petition of D.D. and L.D. (“grandparents”). The grandparents appealed to the Minnesota Court of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Adoption of KureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Jordet v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- In Re the Welfare of M.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In re Petition to Adopt S.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- In Re the Adoption of C.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Brian LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In re the Marriage of: Lian Yang McGaughey v. William Howard Taft McGaughey, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- In re the Marriage of: Patricia A. Kuzara, f/k/a Patricia A. McDermott v. John R. McDermott, Hennepin County, Intervenor.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017