Johnson v. Adamski

Adamski appeals from a judgment in the amount of $1,734.00 plus costs, granted in favor of Johnson because of Adamski ⅛ breach of an express warranty on a horse. Since Adamski did not propose findings of fact or conclusions of law or move for a new trial, we may not review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s findings. We therefore affirm the judgment.

If a party does not present proposed findings of fact, make a motion for a new trial, or by some other apt motion, offer, objection or exception indicate his disagreement with the court’s findings, the sufficiency of the…