Legal Opinion
Hellawell v. Grafeld
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 31, 1938No. 8261PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action is brought by the receiver of the Hewlett-Woodmere National Bank to recover a sum of money alleged to have been illegally paid to the Hewlett Bay Fire District under a mistake of law. As defendants, the plaintiff has named five individuals who are designated and sued as fire commissioners of, and constituting the Hewlett Bay Fire District. One of the defendants is further described and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PottorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- McIntire v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Rosenbaum v. BauerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- City of Marion v. SneedenSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Petrowski v. NuttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947