Legal Opinion

Julio Sandoval v. M. Lopez, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 9, 2026No. 1:23-cv-00248Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JULIO SANDOVAL, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00248 JLT SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 M. LOPEZ, et al., (Doc. 50) 15 Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 17 Plaintiff Julio Sandoval is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 20 The Court issued its First Screening Order on February 21, 2024. (Doc. 17.) It determined 21 that Plaintiff’s first…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API