Legal Opinion

Vrabel v. Vrabel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1983No. 44578PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, P.J.

This is a suit founded on theories of contract and tort. It stems from conditions which developed following the parties’ divorce. The complaint of the plaintiff-appellant ex-wife, Lana Vrabel (plaintiff), was dismissed by the trial court on motion. In issue is the constitutionality of Ohio’s “heart balm” statute.

The judgment is affirmed.

I

The parties were divorced in January 1979. Later that year, the plaintiff moved with her four children to Maumee, Ohio. Her ex-husband, defendant-appellee, William Vrabel (defendant), continued living in the Cleveland area. The plaintiff purchased real estate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Fearon v. TreanorNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Primes v. TylerOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Heck v. SchuppIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Thompson v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State, Ex Rel. Brody v. PeltierOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Shaker Hts. ex rel. Friends of Horseshoe Lake, Inc. v. Shaker Hts.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Grimm v. LynchOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API