Legal Opinion

Geblein v. Arida

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The expense incurred in physical therapy, which includes the diathermy treatments at issue here, although included in defining "basic economic loss” may not be considered in computing the $500 threshold for a "serious injury” as defined under the Insurance Law regardless of where rendered and by whom inasmuch as the statute refers simply to the reasonable charges for nine separate categories of services necessarily performed for a plaintiff as a result of the injury (Insurance Law, § 671, subd 1, par [a], cls [i], [ii]; § 671, subd 4, par…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. RickardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Colenzo v. KernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Goldwire v. YoungsNew York Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. ConeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Sciarrino v. AmbrusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API