Legal Opinion

Sciarrino v. Ambrus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: The expenses of diathermy treatment may not be considered in computing the $500 threshold requirement for a "serious injury” under section 671 (subd 4, par [b]) of the Insurance Law (Geblein v Arida, 55 AD2d 1048; Sanders v Rickard, 51 AD2d 260; see Colenzo v Kernan, 49 AD2d 809). " 'Serious Injury’ ” is defined, under paragraph (a) of subdivision 4 of the same section as a personal injury which results, inter alia, in a "permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function, or system”. The sprains and contusions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. RickardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Colenzo v. KernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Geblein v. AridaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moren v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API