Legal Opinion
Drainage District No. 7 v. Haverstick
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 24, 1932No. 4-2700PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
This is an action for damages to lands of the appellee occasioned by the construction of Drainage District No. 7 in Poinsett County. There was a verdict and judgment for the appellee in the trial court, from which judgment is this appeal.
Drainage District No. 7 was created for the purpose of reclaiming a large territory of swamp lands. The general description of the district may be fonnd in the cases of Sharp v. Drainage District No. 7, 164 Ark. 306, 261 S. W. 923; Keith v. Drainage District No. 7, 181 Ark. 30, 24 S. W. (2d) 875, and Hogge v. Drainage Dist. No. 7, 181 Ark. 564, 26 S. W. (2d)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Drainage Com'rs v. Board of Drainage Com'rsMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
- Love v. CahnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Mizell v. McGowan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Sharp v. Drainage District No. 7Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District v. BartonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Drainage Dist. No. 7District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1938
- Board of Directors, St. Francis Levee Dist. v. MorledgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Flanagan v. Burden Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941