Legal Opinion

Fell v. McCready

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 1932Published

1Dissent

Edgcomb, J. (dissenting).

I am unable to agree with the majority of my associates in the construction which is about to be given to Mr. McCready's will.

*403I quite agree with the statement of the rules which should govern us in the interpretation of this will, as stated in the majority opinion. It is very true that the underlying and controlling rule to be applied to our task is to ascertain and follow the intent of the testator. That intent, to my mind, is clear and apparent. It was not to give Mrs. McCready an absolute and unqualified life estate in the residue of decedent’s estate, but rather…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Robinson v. . MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Walker v. PritchardIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Matter of RookerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Smith v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Knight v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API