Legal Opinion

Matter of Rooker

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1928PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

We are called upon to determine the intent of a testatrix, as shown by the confused provisions of a will. Margaret Hooker bequeathed the residue of her estate to a trustee. It is told to pay from the income $200 per annum to a sister, and any balance remaining to two nephews or to the survivor of them. Upon the death of the sister the trust is to end and the principal is to be divided. Precisely how this is to be done is stated. If the nephews survive, each is to receive such sum as together with the income already paid him, shall amount to $3,000. If one be dead, then his legacy shall go to…

2Cited by48 opinions

  1. In re Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  2. Fell v. McCreadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. In re the Accounting of SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. In Re the Will of SliterNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. In re the Estate of HilliardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API