Legal Opinion

Northwestern National Bank v. Pearson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1918No. 14803PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered January 11, 1918, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a promissory note, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is an action on a $5,000 demand note, given by appellant, defendant, to respondent.

The complaint is in the usual form, and alleged demand and nonpayment. The answer admits the making of the note, that respondent is the holder thereof, and denies the other allegations of the complaint. Affirmatively, the answer gives a history of the making of the note, and presents counterclaims to the effect that appellant is a general contractor and as such procured a *571contract for the construction of viaducts and their approaches, etc., across certain streets of Portland, Oregon ; that, needing funds…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardin v. SweeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. President of the New Hope Delaware Bridge Co. v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allied Sheet Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. Peoples National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Cook v. StrelauWashington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API