Legal Opinion

Khokha v. Shahin

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 2009No. 20080211PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Dr. Inder V.. Khokha appealed and Dr. Salem S. Shahin and Salem S. Shahin, M.D., P.C., a North Dakota Professional Corporation,-cross-appealed from a judgment dismissing Khokha’s defamation action against Shahin after a jury found statements made by Shahin to a patient’s family did not defame Khokha. We hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in its evidentiary rulings and did not err in instructing the jury on qualified privilege. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Shahin is a urologist who has practiced independently in Williston for nearly 30 years. Khokha is a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union v. WDAY, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HernandezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. May v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Forster v. West Dakota Veterinary Clinic, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frueh v. FruehNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Frueh v. FruehNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API