Legal Opinion

Everett v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff brought action for damages sustained by failure of the defendants to deliver certain packages of freight, delivered to the defendant, the Norfolk-Southern Railroad Company, at (69) Elizabeth City, N.C. on 22 October, 1901, to be transported for hire over the lines of the defendant, Norfolk-Southern Railroad Company, via Norfolk, Va., to Thomasville, N.C. on the Southern Railway. The defendants did not deny that certain parcels or packages of freight delivered to the Norfolk-Southern had not been delivered to the plaintiff on demand. Both defendants admitted that under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Railway Co. v. WynnTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Moulton v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Marable v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Mitchell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kime v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Farming Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Fuller v. Virginia & Carolina Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Schloss v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Schloss-Bear-Davis Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API