Legal Opinion

Petish v. Petish

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1985No. Docket 79323Published

1Opinion of the Court

144 Mich. App. 319 (1985)

375 N.W.2d 432

PETISH

v.

PETISH

Docket No. 79323.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided July 15, 1985.

Spencer & Stebbins (by John G. Spencer), for plaintiff.

Currie, Stieper, Haddrill & Seyferth, P.C. (by Nelson B. Stieper), for defendant.

Before: BEASLEY, P.J., and M.J. KELLY and M. WARSHAWSKY,[*] JJ.

M.J. KELLY, J.

Defendant appeals as of right from an order modifying the alimony provisions of a divorce judgment. The trial court ruled that plaintiff's obligation to pay alimony as provided in the consent judgment of divorce was terminated by the defendant's cohabitation with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crouse v. CrouseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Kersten v. KerstenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Dresser v. DresserMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Petish v. PetishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API