Legal Opinion

Petish v. Petish

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1985No. Docket 79323PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, J.

Defendant appeals as of right from an order modifying the alimony provisions of a divorce judgment. The trial court ruled that plaintiffs obligation to pay alimony as provided in the consent judgment of divorce was terminated by the defendant’s cohabitation with another man. We reverse.

Plaintiff and defendant were granted a consent judgment of divorce on September 16, 1983, in which plaintiff was ordered to pay $65 per week in alimony to the defendant for three years or until the defendant remarried, whichever occurred first. Defendant was not employed at the time of the divorce and remained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crouse v. CrouseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Kersten v. KerstenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Dresser v. DresserMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gottsegen v. GottsegenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Gottsegen v. GottsegenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Petish v. PetishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API