Legal Opinion

Celestin v. American Transit Insurance

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided September 26, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Charles J. Markey, J.

The legal issue of first impression raised by this small claims case is whether a driver of a taxicab, who allegedly lost his job after an insurer canceled a policy held by the taxicab company, has standing to sue the insurer for his lost wages.

Upon review of the papers, and the oral argument held on August 21, 2002, the defendant American Transit Insurance Company (ATIC) moves, pursuant to CPLR 3211 and 3212, for dismissal of the complaint and summary judgment.

*73ATIC’s moving papers fail to discuss the applicable facts or to attach a copy of the policy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Strauss v. Belle Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Luedke v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  4. Smith v. Monarch Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Hampton v. District Council 37 Health & Security PlanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brandner v. AgreAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Herrmann v. ColettiCohoes City Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API