Legal Opinion

Tipton v. Warner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Anderson District Court. Suit by Warner against Tipton, to recover,land. Judgment for plaintiff, at the adjourned March term, 1888. The defendant brings error. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Strang, C.:

July 20,1859, at Lawrence, Kas., Samuel S. Tipton received from Isaac Warner three land warrants of the value of $320 and $180 in money, to use in locating land in Kansas for the benefit of Isaac Warner, with the understanding between said Tipton and Warner that, if said Warner was not suited with the land selected by Tipton, Tipton should pay him his money back, including $320 for the warrants, in one year, with interest at the rate of 10 per cent. Tipton located said warrants upon lands in Anderson and Coffey counties, Kansas, in his own name. He never deeded any of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Missouri Valley R. R. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  3. Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Dodd v. BolesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Watson v. Travelers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API